Would that be okay if the medicine being used would eventually save countless lives? Animals used in such product testing are often abused and suffer from serious side-effects. Animals are exploited by human beings in the name of medical research as they lack the ability to fight back and as a result, they suffer needlessly; in the light of today's world tests on animals are only diverting the attention from other viable means of research, therefore it should be stopped at once. The first couple sentences will help your reader decide whether they want to continue reading your essay or not. Animal testing is arrogant and incredibly cruel. Laboratory animals are almost tortured to death to extract information for the ultimate welfare of the human beings, to us exploiting these animals for our benefits is completely justifiable- as the superior mammalian species, it is our responsibility to treat them well.
Animals are tested in treatments to determine how a drug or treatment will affect a human being, and several more health care purposes. However we can maintain animal rights. While testing on animals is not morally ideal, we lack good alternatives. This article will provide you research paper help on ethical implications of animal experimentation. Do you have no idea how to get started and what to write about? Would you then think differently about the products you 're buying. These studies are misleading by the fact that tests on different species often provide conflicting results. I mean why are scientists using animals when we can use humans for more reliable information.
For decades the value of animal research has been grossly overrated. Inflicting pain and despair upon helpless animals so that we can be spared of pain are not morally right, it is arrogant. When we strive to become better than we are, everything around us becomes better too. Scientists use animals to test the safety of chemicals in food products and cosmetics. Additionally, the Animal Welfare Act covers only dogs, cats, primates, rabbits, hamsters, and guinea pigs. This is exactly why the essay hook exists and is such an important tool. Some people claim that animals do not have rights and mankind naturally has dominion over them, making it acceptable to use them for scientific experimentation.
Some dogs, cats and a variety of goats, monkeys and rabbits have also been used. Typically it is conducted for advancement in scientific research, to test products and food before going out into the market, to find treatments or test medical drugs, and to protect people and the environment. The safety testing of chemicals and consumer products account for only about ten percent of the use of animal testing laboratories. One cannot use animals unless all other methods are inapplicable - and their use, when allowed, is governed. Most of these experiments conducted on animals are painful for them. Although these animals are unable to defend themselves or signs of any form of consent for the near death procedures, these companies find this as a cheap solution for testing their products before placing scientific field, people find that the richest discoveries in health or medicine generally depend on animal testing.
Currently, animals are often used in medical testing, make-up testing, and other consumer product testing. The original purpose of animal testing was inventing drugs for human diseases. Questions that may be posed in argumentative essays on animal testing Why do people need animal testing? Animal laboratory testing is the right circumstance to test products to cure diseases for all living things on Earth. Moreover, the factor of moral obligations entreat the facts humanity, multitude amounts of animals are mistreated and eradicated during animal testing. Millions of animals are being tested every year and laws are not helping at all. Animals have no syntax and so there is no way to accurately communicate with them. People produce a new medicine or cosmetics.
If these atrocious acts were committed outside laboratories, they would be felonies. Animal abuse can be more than what meets the eye. In a book called Science, Medicine, and Animals and written by the National Research Council of The National Academies, talks about on how the lives of the animals and the humans; how they mutual benefit in their lasting bonds. Or some other deadly disease? Some people argue for models, taking the use of animals completely out of the research equation, while others advocate the continued use of animals, only if a standard level of care is set. You throw a lot of laws in a lot of jurisdictions at us, but it's disorganized. Many investigations can be carried out with mathematical modelations, or in vitro studies, but when the interest is drug-activity in multi-organ organisms, living animals is still the best choice Quimby, 1998.
Even if the rabbit lives through the experiment, there still going to kill him to see what happened to his organs. This can save many animals, and many species. This act was signed by President Lyndon Johnson in 1966 Engber. Animals suffer as much as humans do, therefore why should we treat them any differently than we treat each other. First and foremost, animal experiments are unkind and cause animals a lot of pain. Introduction Annually, more than 100.
However, as surprised as this may. Risko Middle Township High School Imagine a world where humans are taken to laboratories and tested on in a callous manner. Primates and some other animals are captured from the wild. Alan Price, Andy Summers, Animal testing 1601 Words 7 Pages Holly Mauch Sue Vander Hook Eng. Terms that you may associate with animal testing would vary greatly, but there are some that can be used as an example such as testing, experiment, abuse, negligence, and acceptable.
In conclusion, until there are good alternatives, animal-testing must prevail. There is also some good topic related vocabulary in the animal testing essay such as 'life saving drugs' and 'bred' and a mix of , such as : 'Although it may improve the lives of humans, it is not fair that animals should suffer in order to achieve this'. In the words of the U. Diethylene glycol is toxic unless treated, and 105 patients died Wax, 1995. Also, they should not be used to test products on. From our own experiences, we know that these things are priceless to us; we are familiar with the fear that arises from any of them being threatened.
The other group of people in this debate believe that animal testing is necessary in order to research new products that cannot be tested on humans. Later that decade, Sabin developed the oral polio-vaccine. While scientists and researchers are still looking for effective alternative ways to move from animal testing, we also get a part to play to relieve animals of this sinister pain. Almost every breakthrough we have had has some part of animal testing. This animal testing is called vivisection. I know, for sure, I would never want to put any animal through these horrible experiments.