Animal testing pros. What are the pros and cons of cosmetic testing on animals? 2019-01-09
Animal testing pros Rating:
8,6/10
148
reviews
Animal Testing Pros and Cons
That means there are more than 20 million animals who could be at a high risk of abuse or neglect in the name of research. It is not proven as the main reason for medical breakthroughs. The Anderson Cancer Center animal research also associated the vaccine for Hepatitis B with experimentation on chimpanzees. Unless every product, which is being tested, is proven safe for public consumption, proponents of this method do not see the need for doing it. These include birds, fish, mice and rats. Biomedical research using animals is a largely secretive process and the public knows little about what goes on in research labs. Up to 100 million animals, from fish to chimpanzees, may be used every year for the purpose of animal research.
For example, in a study at the Mayo Clinic by David Wiebers and his colleagues aimed at identifying drugs to treat ischemic stroke, the researchers found that 25 compounds that reduced the damage done by such events in cats, rodents and other animals had no beneficial effect whatsoever in people. With the advent of modern molecular biology and its analytical methods, scientists can now quantify the precise extent to which humans resemble other animals, genetically speaking. Reliable studies: Animals are similar to humans in terms of physiology and behavior to pain. Monkeys, rabbits, cats, ferrets, pigs, sheep and chimpanzees are just some of the animals used for biomedical experiments, science education, and product and cosmetics testing. Further, they were also sent to space, , etc.
Provides adequate living, whole body system test subject No other living thing in this planet has the closest anatomical structure as humans than animals. He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures. Microorganisms also don't harm animals. Based on the pros and cons listed above, which side are you on? I believe the only reason that they posted this is because humans are their own kind. There are drugs and products that could be harmful to animals, but highly beneficial to humans, and the current state of research priority would make it extremely difficult to know if this was the case. Unlike testing in humans, the animals testing is so through and harsh. You can decide for yourself, whether you are for, against or just a mute spectator to animal testing.
If one assumes that human life is more valuable than animal life, then performing experiments on animals makes sense because it offers the chance to explore how the various living systems within a body may react when exposed to a test sample. If the human benefit seems to outweigh the costs of the animal lives, then the only allowable animal experiments must provide the greatest of human benefit. In some cases, after considering available alternatives, companies may determine that animal testing is necessary to assure the safety of a product or ingredient. Animals are just suffering and dying in vain by being subjects in dangerous tests that do not even have direct human benefits. Combined with blood analysis, results will be produced. While it is important to provide a full explanation of the reasons for modern medicine, it can sometimes be useful to have a handful of short pro animal research one-liners on hand.
There are many pros and cons to the practice of animal testing. Imagine if vaccines were not tested on animals—millions of them would be dying from serious diseases, such as rabies, distemper, tetanus, leukemia, parvo, infectious hepatitis virus and anthrax. Alternatives to Animal Testing As technology moves forward, there is less and less need for animal experimentation. Thus, it should also be the same with animal testing on cosmetics. Above all, though, is that the testing certainly can and often does involve the pain and suffering of the animals.
12 Advantages and Disadvantages of Animal Testing On Cosmetics
The price of animals themselves must also be factored into the equation. Now, both sides of the argument are standing their grounds with firm and solid opinions being pushed, making it difficult for them to reach any agreement. The reason why mice are frequently used in animal research is that their genetic profile is 98% similar to humans. According to the Humane Society International, animals are routinely force-fed, forced to inhale noxious compounds, deprived of food and water, physically restrained for prolonged periods, and burned; some of them reportedly even have their necks broken and are decapitated. Some animals are almost carbon copies of humans. And for testing adverse reactions, there is also the method called microdosing, where small doses are being administered on humans themselves.
Life of animals: Animals live in their own set of environment conditions. No one knows what knowledge that will be attained through animal testing, so the value of such animal testing cannot be ascertained ahead of time or even guessed. Again, it is commonly considered that the safety of people outweighs the safety of animals, thus animal testing for safety is common. Agreed, when people say millions of animals are killed worldwide for food. Many proponents of animal experimentation claim that the process is for a good cause. Why are animals used for safety testing? In fact, about 97% of the physicians also supported the continuous use of animals for clinical and basic research.
It provides an opportunity to examine a complete life cycle. Hence, one need not have animal ethical permissions to perform research on them. Proponents claim that most medical breakthroughs in the last century were direct results of animal experimentation. Mice and rats are empathetic and studies have shown that they will risk themselves to rescue cage-mates in captivity. Now multiple those costs over an entire laboratory and the cost of animal research becomes very high, very quickly.
But, as English philosopher and social reformer Jeremy Bentham puts it, it is not a question of whether they can talk or reason, but whether or not they suffer. Other research has resulted in treatments for strokes and heart attacks that save thousands of lives and reduce recovery time. Another importance of this practice is that it has helped save endangered species from extinction. People often overlook the fact, that may breakthroughs in veterinary medicine has occurred due to this experimentation. So this shows animal study is cheaper than using direct human subjects. Arguments on each side certainly have their compelling strengths.
