The reader does not yet know what the circumstances were that led to the speaker shooting the man. While it has always been customary for uneducated men to join the army, the narrator doesn't seem to take pride in his country or duty. Roughly, the half or less than half of a pint. This poem was written by Thomas Hardy who was incredibly pessimistic about the society. Thomas Hardy wrote poems such as The Man He Killed as a way to express his feelings about the Boer wars which were going on during his time.
It is easy to appreciate this poem and to identify with the soldier and his feelings, sympathizing with his predicament and sensing that he regrets having had to kill his enemy. Despite the fact that he knows the obvious reasons for his actions, that during a war it is a 'kill or be killed' situation, he still tries to find a deeper meaning. This stanza makes it clear that the speaker wishes that he had met this man under different circumstances. Many a poets, philosophers and socio political thinkers have lifted their pens on this topic, but all of their observations are referential. Keywords: The Man he Killed summary, Meaning of The Man he Killed , The Man he Killed notes, The Man he Killed explanation,The Man he Killed analysis, The Man he Killed theme.
In this essay I intend to compare the poems by historical, social and the cultural aspects of the poems,I will also examine poetic language in the poems. There were so many instances of friend fighting and brother fighting brother. The Man is the soldier who has been shot dead, He, the speaker of the poem, who shoots the soldier. Hardy, by representing an honest aftermath of war through a rural setting, tries to drive home the point he so fervently makes. His work expresses the idea that human suffering and tragedy are inevitable with a tone of stoic pessimism. The banality of death in times of war is also highlighted while the speaker ruminates on killing the soldier without a second thought. While the narrator's characterization is influential, the tone of the poem also promotes the theme of inhumanity.
The speaker recalls a time when he shot a man in war, and realizes that if they had met at a bar instead of on the battlefield, they could have had a grand ol' time. However, he keeps justifying his action, which makes us wonder about it. He shares the contrast between how he treated the man and how he would have treated. This poem is quite sorrowful unlike suicide in the trenches which has more of a darker plot about the effects war can induce on a person mentally not just by the enemy. He came back from the front being alone. In this line, or is inserted as a weak proposition but this is poetic worth of this line that the weaker argument in the end is the soul of this poem. In this poem too, Hardy keeps up his reputation by attacking the Victorian world for glorifying war culture and making war seem heroic.
We understand that individual soldiers do not necessarily nurture hatred for those they are fighting against, but see them as human beings in circumstances similar to their own, enlisting in order to earn money and support a family. In fact, it only seems to be mentioned in passing, as if only to make the reader understand the situation. Hardy began his writing career as a novelist, publishing Desperate Remedies in 1871, and was soon successful enough to leave the field of architecture for writing. Introduction This poem is about a man who was in the war and is thinking about his memories in the war. At first, the speaker tries to justify shooting the man. Hardy's choice of words causes the reader to feel the narrator's unsettling emotions about his situation. By condemning his own action and subverting it at the same time the speaker makes it clear that the ones to blame are the few, select ones for whose cause millions die, and many become killers.
By killing the soldier of the enemy faction, he suffers a death too, albeit figurative. There I see two parts that attract me. One eigth of a sovereign or £0. If you want to contact us regarding any particular content on the website, please use the contact page. Perhaps this near death experience was what caused the speaker to think about the other man rather than himself. After all, Hardy characterizes the narrator as being interested in personal gain when he mentions that he enlisted because he was out of work, and the poem fails to mention any cause or loyalty. Autoplay next video Had he and I but met By some old ancient inn, We should have set us down to wet Right many a nipperkin! It is something else if he is justified in his approach or not.
Instead, animalistic brutality takes over; chaos and greed conquer the harmony and compassion that most humans desperately long for. He was probably a lot like me. Hardy tells us that, without a war, these two could have met at an inn and shared a drink. Instead of metaphors and similes, the poem focuses on a 'what if' type of situation. You can go through the here. In the fourth stanza, the poet says that my foe who was not his foe at all would also have been rationalizing the same situation but, in wars, we have to set aside all such sort of emotions and kill the man in front for some other reason.
The poem is written in a conversational tone, with speech marks included, making us feel that the soldier is addressing us personally in an informal way, and pleading with us to understand his action in killing his enemy. We analyzed the poem about the sparkling love of a pensioner and his wife. You shoot a fellow down You'd treat, if met where any bar is, Or help to half a crown. He never shows a distinct intent to kill another man, yet he does so because of his obligations to the army. When our response to disagreement is violence, nothing is resolved. The stanza, however, ends with the word 'although', telling us that the writer is not in fact at ease with the idea that he has killed his enemy.
Yes; quaint and curious war is! Here the poet uses symbol of 'ancient inn' that stands both for childhood and the age where there was no sophisory. To summarize, the speaker is attempting to explain to others and to him why he killed another soldier, one from the opposing side. Though obtrusive in mood, the poet has beautifully expressed his contemplative theme into comprehendible imagery and tangible setting. But ranged as infantry, And staring face to face, I shot at him as he at me, And killed him in his place. The writer falters at the end of the opening line of the third stanza as he tries to justify his action. It tells how an elderly citizen sought love after the war in Iraq.
The fact that he was at war was not reason enough for the speaker. This poem is written in first person, making us feel like it's somebody's own story. What sort of man was this person that he killed? He admits he killed a man of the opposing faction because he belonged to the enemy troop, but he also admits that he probably would have been a friend to him in other circumstances. The title in Flanders field talks about the field in Belgium where the background for this poem is set. In 1902 that would of course have had considerably more value than it does just over one hundred years later. Due to negative reception of his controversial novels, Hardy turned his attention to poetry and short stories.